This page looks plain and unstyled because you're using a non-standard compliant browser. To see it in its best form, please upgrade to a browser that supports web standards. It's free and painless.
"Then leading him to a height, Satan showed him in a moment of time
all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor and said to him, 'I
will give you all this power and glory of all these kingdoms....worship
me then and it shall be all yours.' Then Jesus replied, 'Be off, Satan!
For scripture says: You must worship your Lord, your God and serve Him
alone.' (Matthew 4:8-10)
This beautifully evocative passage from Matthew contains a succinct
spiritual statement concerning the worldly history of mankind – a
history replete with ambition, desire, conquest, hegemony, and empire
building. Satan's offer to Jesus represents the ultimate profane offer
- every kingdom of the world with all the accompanying power, glory and
wealth - a naked appeal to the ego and to the avaricious aspects of the
nafs (soul) in its lowest state of being. We have to wonder whether
Satan was so deluded as to believe that Jesus would actually succumb to
such
transparent bribery - perhaps it is indicative of the limits within
which
Satan is forced to operate - when faced with a faithful servant of God
he
can only increase the magnitude of his offer, not alter its nature. "Surely
the strategy of the Shaitan is weak...." (Qur'an 4:76) Of course,
Jesus
easily
saw the crux of the matter, and banished Satan away. The passage
concludes
with the statement, "Then Satan left him and angels came and attended
Jesus."
This is the case for Jesus. But this offer of Satan's - this deal with
the devil is one that we can imagine has been offered again and again
(in more limited but endlessly varied ways) throughout the history of
mankind. Satan's offer is always present. 'I will give you power,
glory, and empire in your time - just bend towards me - a little bow, a
small acknowledgement through casting aside of truth, compassion, and
principle and I'll assist you on your way to conquest, hegemony,
wealth, power, glory. All your ambitions realized at the expense of
others.'
It is as if this offer has remained on the table from the beginning of
human history, and every era has had its takers - snatching the bargain
greedily off the table before it falls into other's hands. A history of
conquests,
of monopolies, of dominance, of political, military, and
economic
manipulation and sovereignty - that's how we're taught history
- as an endless parade of pharaohs, dynasties, kingdoms, fiefdoms,
sultanates,
empires, dictatorships, republics, or democracies all engaged in an
increasingly
vicious, brutish, and nasty game of King of the Hill.
Somehow, when we come to our own time, to our own nations, we're
ideologically caught up in the game and must struggle to view it with
the historical perspective through which we viewed the previous
scrambles for the top of the hill. Too often, we'll defend our own
nation's scramble to the top, no matter how
much devastation is caused while taking the hill, no matter what
principles are shattered or what brazen lies are promulgated. Such
measures are simply considered to be part of a realistic worldview –
one in which geopolitical realities must be understood and acknowledged
and a certain amount of violence and ruthlessness is considered as
necessary to achieve security and deal with
the harsh truths of a ruthless world.
Jesus wasn't just offered the position of King of the Hill, but that of
King of the mother of all hills - a kingdom encompassing all other
kingdoms past, present, and future - and he cast it aside as worthless
dross. While he saw the whole of this dance of worldly dominance as
inconsequential, how is it that so many others have struck the devil's
bargain even for small specks
of power, seeking dominion over any hillock, no matter how small or
insignificant. The lure of the game is powerful, almost irresistible,
it seems. And as
the world shrinks with the increasingly speedy growth of technology and
the advent of an age of scientific miracles, the stakes of the game
become
great. Technology is a vast and immensely powerful lever that extends
and
strengthens potential human reach and brings the possibility of
control,
surveillance, and dominion into jurisdictions that were previously free
of interference. The stakes for those of us who live on this hill (that
is,
the earth) are considerable. We're arriving at an age in which everyone
is
affected by the game - whether we cast aside the devil's bargain or
accept it, we're going to suffer the effects of the battle for the
summit – there will be precious
few places of refuge remaining.
The devil's contract is already laid out - the offer is on the table
(it’s perpetually present in every era although it becomes increasingly
tempting at certain critical historical junctures or following
historically precipitous events) - a tantalizing lure to those nations
whose ambitions already lean in that direction. From the perspective of
a long and bloody human history, it's an elementary deduction to
ascertain that someone is always eager to take the bait even if getting
the prize involves a de-facto deal with the devil – “'I will give you
all this power and glory …worship me then and it
shall be all yours….” (Matthew 4:8,9) Of course, this is not a literal
deal.
After all, what one values...what one worships, is indicated not solely
by
words that come from the mouth but by the character and spirit that
determines intentions, animates purpose, and manifests in deeds. As the
qur'an says of those whose intentions and actions and hidden aims are
bonded powerfully to opportunistic, temporal, acquisitive, mercenary,
uncompassionate ends: "Did I not charge you, O children of Adam!
that you should not worship the Shaitan?" (Qur'an 36:60) A
corrupted worship - seeking what the ego desires (an individual ego,
a nation's ego, an economic, military, or ideological ego) in disregard
of
truth and heedless of the welfare of others, while falsely
propagandizing what is sought as if it is born of a pure worship, true
intention, or noble aims - this is like associating Satan with God.
"And the Shaitan (Satan) shall say after the affair is decided:
Surely Allah promised you the Promise of truth, and I gave you alluring
promises, then failed to keep them to you, and I had no authority over
you, except that I called you and you obeyed me, therefore do not blame
me but blame yourselves: I cannot be your helper (now) nor can you be
my helpers; surely I disbelieved in your associating me with Allah
before; surely it is the unjust that shall have the painful punishment."
(Qur'an 14:22)
Iblis (Satan) indicates that he simply lays out the temptation - it is
that which is in one's own character and makeup that causes them to
respond to (or reject) the offer. As Rumi says:
"Iblis said, 'Solve this mystery! I am the touchstone of the false
coin and the true. God made me the test of lion and cur. He made me the
test of genuine and counterfeit. When did I ever blacken the
counterfeit
coin's face? I am the assayer. I only declare its worth....Severity and
gentleness were married and a world of good and evil was born from the
two....Display
the food of the spirit and the food of the ego! If he seeks the food of
the ego, he is defective, but if he seeks the food of the spirit, he is
a chief. If he serves the body, he is an ass, but if he enters the
ocean
of the spirit, he will find a pearl. Although these two - good and evil
- are different, both perform a single task.... How can I make good
into
bad? I am not God. I invite them, I am not their Creator." (Rumi -
Mathnavi)
The invitation is perpetually present - so that every era faces weak
facsimiles of the temptation faced by Christ – but the temptation is a
means to unearth the true character of nations as well as individuals –
to see what glittery prizes they stumble after and who joins with them.
The history of each generation is a complex map of how the diverse
elements of that generation faced the alluring seduction of Shaitan’s
offer.
“Let it not deceive you that those who misbelieve go (arrogantly) to
and fro in the land. It is a slight and fading possession….”
(Qur'an 3:196)
An excerpt from Imam Ali's letter of advice to Malik al-Ashtar at
the time of Ashtar's appointment as governor of Egypt.
"Know, O Malik, that....people will look upon your affairs in the same
way that you were wont to look upon the affairs of the rulers before
you. They will speak about you as you were wont to speak about those
rulers. And the righteous are only known by that which God causes to
pass concerning them on the tongues of His servants. So let the dearest
of your treasuries be the
treasury of righteous action. Control your desire and restrain your
soul from
what is not lawful to you, for restraint of the soul is for it to be
equitous
in what it likes and dislikes. Infuse your heart with mercy, love and
kindness
for your subjects. Be not in face of them a voracious animal, counting
them
as easy prey, for they are of two kinds: either they are your brothers
in
religion or your equals in creation. Error catches them unaware,
deficiencies
overcome them, (errors) are committed by them intentionally and by
mistake.
So grant them your pardon and your forgiveness to the same extent that
you
hope God will grant you His pardon and His forgiveness. For you are
above
them, and he who appointed you is above you, and God is above him who
appointed
you. God has sought from you the fulfillment of their requirements and
He
is trying you with them....
Never
be regretful of pardon or rejoice at punishment, and never hasten (to
act)
upon an impulse if you can find a better course. Never say, "I am
invested with authority, I give orders and I am obeyed," for surely
that is corruption in the heart, enfeeblement of the religion and an
approach to changes (in fortune)....
See that justice is done towards God and justice is done
towards the people by yourself, your own family and those whom you
favor among your subjects. For if you do not do so, you have worked
wrong. And as for him who
wrongs the servants of God, God is his adversary, not to speak of His
servants....
Let the dearest of your affairs be those which are middlemost in
rightfulness,
most inclusive in justice and most comprehensive in (establishing) the
content of the subjects. For the discontent of the common people
invalidates the content of favorites, and the discontent of favorites
is pardoned at (the achievement of) the content of the masses.
Moreover, none of the subjects is more burdensome upon the ruler in
ease and less of a help to him in trial than his favorites. (None are)
more disgusted by equity, more importunate in demands, less grateful
upon bestowal, slower to pardon (the ruler upon his) withholding
(favor) and
more deficient in patience at the misfortunes of time than the
favorites. Whereas the support of religion, the solidarity of Muslims
and preparedness in the face of the enemy lie only with the common
people of the community, so let your inclination and affection be
toward them. Let the farthest of your subjects from you and the most
hateful to you be he who most seeks out the faults of men....
Know that there is nothing more conducive to the ruler's trusting his subjects than that he be kind towards them, lighten their burdens and abandon coercing them in that in which they possess not the ability. So in this respect you should attain a situation in which you can confidently trust your subjects, for trusting (them) will sever from you lasting strain."
(Ali's
letter to Malik al-Ashtar - from "A Shi'ite Anthology" -
translated by William Chittick)